More states drop permit requirements for concealed carry. Two Midwestern states—Ohio and Indiana—have just stopped requiring a permit to carry a concealed firearm in public. These changes come on the heels of Alabama doing the same.
This brings the number of states that allow permit-free concealed carry up to 24.
Makes sense, right? If you can legally own a firearm, you should be able legally to take it outside your home. Conversely, “may issue” rules—which give law enforcement agencies veto power over whether you can carry a gun—don’t really jibe with the right to bear arms (and also seem likely to result in discriminatory enforcement). “If you have to ask permission, it’s a privilege, not a right,” as J.D. Tuccille says.
But not everyone is pleased. “Opening the door to unrestricted concealed carry seems like a bad idea,” wrote Tuscaloosa News photo editor Gary Cosby Jr. Permitless concealed carry laws “make gun violence worse,” John Feinblatt of Everytown for Gun Safety told CNN. A Daily Beast piece by Michael B. Cohen calls it “absolute madness.”
To make his point, Cohen points out that Ohio’s concealed carry permit had required only eight hours of safety training while “obtaining a license to cut hair in Ohio requires the completion of at 1,500 hours enrolled in a cosmetology school program,” even though guns are more dangerous than haircuts. That seems more like an argument against Ohio’s licensing rules for hairdressers than anything else.
Anyway, I’m puzzled by the idea that not requiring permits for carrying guns will somehow result in violent anarchy.
People commit gun crimes whether concealed carry is allowed or not, and whether the state says they need a permission slip to do so or not. That’s the whole thing about being a criminal: not following the law. That means the only people burdened by obtaining a concealed carry permit—paying a fee, taking classes, and anything else required—are law-abiding citizens.
Concealed carry permits don’t stop crime; they just increase the burden on non-criminals. And this could put people in more danger, since it likely means fewer law-abiding people carrying weapons outside their homes and fewer chances for such people to intervene if a thief or maniac starts shooting or threatening to shoot innocent people.
Some will argue that concealed carry can lead to more crimes of passion outside the home—situations where someone doesn’t plan to commit violence but blows up and then uses a gun in public because they have it on them. But does anyone really think that violent hothead in question would be less likely to go off if he’d paid a fee to the state earlier that year? Or if he had only taken eight hours of gun safety classes?
Meanwhile, concealed-carry rules invite police action against anyone carrying—or “suspected” of carrying—a gun outside the home.
For what it’s worth, we don’t have a ton of data on this subject. But a 2018 American College of Surgeons study found “no statistically significant association between the liberalization of state-level firearm carry legislation over the last 30 years and the rates of homicides or other violent crime.”
Gun-control advocates “point to states that saw crime rise after passing permitless carry laws,” notes Cleveland.com. “However, there is no analysis about what role, if any, permitless carry played in any of these crime trends, which are influenced by other factors besides conceal-carry laws.”
While there’s little research available on the impact of permitless-carry laws, there is significantly more on the effect of loosening state conceal-carry permit rules, specifically for states that move from a “may issue” state where officials can decide whether to issue a conceal-carry permit to a “shall issue” or “right-to-carry” state where officials must issue a license unless the applicant is a felon or has some other disqualification….But the conclusions reached by these studies have been all over the map, and there’s been an ongoing debate for decades about the effects — if any — of loosening state gun-control laws.
Check out Reason‘s coverage of concealed carry laws here.
President Joe Biden’s disapproval rating is still above 50 percent:
New national NBC News poll
Biden overall job rating among adults:
Approve: 40% (-3 from Jan. 2022)
Disapprove: 55% (+1)
March 18-22, +/- 3.1%
— Mark Murray (@mmurraypolitics) March 27, 2022
Biden’s new tax scheme for wealthy households would collect on assets even if they aren’t sold. “If enacted, the measure would likely face legal challenges to its constitutionality under the 16th Amendment,” notes The Wall Street Journal.
Under current law, capital gains are taxed only when they are realized—when the asset is sold—and they are taxed at lower rates than ordinary income. When people die, those unrealized gains aren’t taxed as income. Instead, heirs pay capital-gains taxes only on the gains since the prior owner’s death, and only when the heirs sell. They do often owe estate taxes on their net worth at death.
Under Biden’s new proposal, unrealized gains would be taxed.
• “Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Sunday that he was ready to discuss adopting a neutral status as part of a potential peace agreement with Moscow,” reports CNBC.
• The White House reassures people the Biden isn’t really calling for regime change in Russia:
????President Biden ended his speech seeming to call for regime change in Russia: “For Gods sake, this man cannot remain in power!”
Immediately after, a WH official walks that back. “He was not discussing Putin’s power in Russia, or regime change.” pic.twitter.com/kFCJGacwNH
— Jacqui Heinrich (@JacquiHeinrich) March 26, 2022
• Will Smith slapped Oscar host Chris Rock onstage after Rock made a joke about Smith’s wife’s hair.
• Here’s a complete list of the Oscar winners from last night.
• What it’s like to witness a nuclear explosion.
• “Broken windows policing” is back.
• Shanghai is undergoing China’s “most extensive lockdown in two years.”
• A Denver man is facing felony charges for making an illegal pickleball court.